SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Resting-state hippocampal asymmetry as a marker for memory and olfactory deficit in parkinson's disease.

Sci Rep · 2025-11-26

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-29976-2PMID: 41298806

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Memory decline is a central cognitive symptom in Parkinson's Disease (PD). While task-fMRI studies link hippocampal activity (AHA) to poorer memory and olfactory performance, this relationship during rest remains understudied. The objectives of this study are to examine differences in resting-state hippocampal networks, explore the occurrence of reduced AHA within these networks, and investigate its impact on memory and olfaction in PD. Thirty-nine PD patients awaiting evaluation for device-aided Parkinson therapy and 46 healthy controls (HC) underwent resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI). PD patients also completed a memory and olfactory assessment. Co-activation pattern (CAP) analysis was performed on the rs-fMRI data. Our results demonstrated reduced activity in two hippocampal networks in PD: Network 1, incorporating the visual cortex, cerebellum, superior parietal lobule, and precuneus, and Network 5, incorporating parts of the central executive network. PD subgroups with reduced AHA in Network 1 and 5 performed significantly worse on tests of auditory-verbal short-term, long-term and recognition memory, as well as odor identification. In conclusion, within specific resting-state hippocampal networks, reduced AHA in PD is linked to poorer auditory-verbal memory and odor identification.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.