SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Comparing the Informative Value of 2-Minute Segments of the 6-Minute Walk Test: Insights into a Prospective Study on Parkinson's Disease.

Sensors (Basel) · 2025-11-20

DOI: 10.3390/s25227076PMID: 41305283

Open accessComparative Study; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Gait assessment is key in Parkinson's disease (PD), but the psychometric properties of common tests like the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) are not fully established. Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) offer objective gait measures, potentially reducing repeated testing. This study evaluated whether the resampling of the first 2 min of the 6MWT (2'6MWT) reflects full-test performance in 43 early-to-mild PD patients (median age 65) at baseline, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups. A trunk-mounted IMU recorded distance covered, walking duration, stride length, gait speed, cadence, and symmetry. Analysis focused on participants with complete longitudinal data from a multicenter original cohort of 62. Stride length and gait speed (2'6MWT vs. 6MWT) demonstrated strong correlations (r > 0.98), near-perfect agreement, <5% error, and stability across follow-ups; cadence showed slightly more variability. The analysis of consecutive 2-min intervals of the 6MWT revealed stable stride length and gait speed, with modest decreases in distance and cadence over time. Exploratory associations of 2'6MWT and 6MWT with motor severity and cognitive status were consistent. These results indicate the 2'6MWT is a reliable, time-efficient alternative to the full 6MWT for assessing walking capacity in PD, especially in outpatient or fatigue-prone patients. The full 6MWT remains valuable for detecting subtle endurance- or fatigue-related changes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.