SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

ParCuR-A Novel AI-Enabled Gait Cueing Wearable for Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Sensors (Basel) · 2025-11-20

DOI: 10.3390/s25227077PMID: 41305286

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Freezing of gait (FoG) is a common motor symptom in advanced Parkinson's disease, leading to falls, disability, and reduced quality of life. Although cueing systems using visual or auditory stimuli can help patients resume walking, existing solutions are often expensive, uncomfortable, and conspicuous. ParCuR (Parkinson Cueing and Rehabilitation) is a compact, ankle-worn wearable integrating an inertial sensor, haptic stimulator, and AI-based software. It was developed to detect FoG episodes in real time and provides automatic sensory cues to assist patients with Parkinson's Disease (PwP). A classifier was trained for FoG detection using the DAPHNet dataset, comparing patient-specific and patient-independent models. While a small-scale trial with PwP assessed usability and reliability. ParCuR is watch-sized (35 × 41 mm), discreet, and comfortable for daily use. The online detection algorithm triggers stimulation within 0.7 s of episode onset and achieves 94.9% sensitivity and 91.3% specificity using only 14 frequency-based features. Preliminary trials confirmed device feasibility and guided design refinements. This low-cost, wearable solution supports personalized, real-time FoG detection and responsive cueing, improving patient mobility while minimizing discomfort and continuous stimulation habituation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.