SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Riboflavin-sensitized photoinduced degradation of donepezil hydrochloride: kinetic and computational insights for pharmaceutical formulation.

RSC Adv · 2025-11-25

DOI: 10.1039/d5ra07553jPMID: 41306676

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Donepezil (DPZ) photosensitized degradation by riboflavin (RF) at pH 2.0-12.0 has been carried out in aerobic and anaerobic conditions under UV and visible irradiation to give an idea to pharmaceutical formulators to develop a stable co-formulation to administer to elderly patients with neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease). The photolysis rate constants (k obs) in aerobic and anaerobic conditions in the presence of RF (0.1-0.5 × 10-4 M) range from 0.25-11.5 and 0.025-1.120 × 10-2 min-1, respectively. RF catalyzes the photodegradation of DPZ, and the second-order (k 2) constants in aerobic and anaerobic conditions range from 0.32 to 8.22 and 0.032 to 0.805 × 10-2 M-1 min-1, respectively, indicating that with an increase in the concentrations of RF, the rate of photolysis of DPZ also increases. The k-pH profile shows a bell-shaped curve from pH 2.0 to 4.0 and from pH 5.0 to 12.0, forming a sigmoid curve. The two-component spectrometric and HPLC green methods have been developed and validated for estimating DPZ and RF in pure and degraded solutions. Additionally, computational studies have been conducted to assess the formation of the ground-state complex, binding affinity, and molecular interactions between DPZ and RF.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.