NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundAssessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation with iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine ([123I]mIBG) scintigraphy is conventionally performed by determining the heart-to-mediastinum ratio (HMR) on planar images. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of determining HMR from reprojected [123I]mIBG planar images derived from tomographic data by a ring-configured cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) gamma camera and its agreement with HMR determined from [123I]mIBG planar images by an Anger gamma camera, in the assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation.MethodsA total of 105 study participants (suspected idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder n = 55, early-stage Parkinson's Disease n = 36, and healthy controls n = 14) who were referred for [123I]mIBG myocardial scintigraphy were included, in addition to eight phantom experiments simulating a range of HMR. HMR was determined from planar and reprojected planar images acquired with an Anger gamma camera and a ring-configured CZT gamma camera, respectively, for all study participants and phantom experiments. Agreement in HMR between the two imaging methods was analyzed in Bland-Altman plots. Intra- and interobserver variability was evaluated for both imaging methods in a subset of images.ResultsThe agreement between planar and reprojected planar images was good, with a mean difference in HMR of 0.11 (95% limits of agreement -0.16 to 0.38) for the study participants. Intra- and interobserver variability was low and comparable for both imaging methods. Results from the phantom experiments were consistent with those from the study participants.ConclusionsDetermining HMR from reprojected [123I]mIBG myocardial scintigraphy planar images acquired with a ring-configured CZT gamma camera is feasible and shows good agreement with HMR determined from planar images by a conventional Anger gamma camera.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.