SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The relationship between neuropsychiatric dimensions and markers of Parkinson's disease risk in the UK Biobank.

NPJ Parkinsons Dis · 2025-12-01

DOI: 10.1038/s41531-025-01181-yPMID: 41326418

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neuropsychiatric symptoms are a significant yet often overlooked aspect of Parkinson's disease (PD). Using UK Biobank data, we examined associations between neuropsychiatric dimensions and PD risk markers. Factor analysis identified four dimensions-Depression, Anxiety, Adult Stress-Adversity, and Alcohol- and Substance-Related Behaviours (ASRB) -across three groups: PD, healthy controls, and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) as neurological controls. These dimensions showed distinct patterns in PD. Depression scores were significantly elevated, while ASRB scores were consistently lower. Neuroimaging linked ASRB to subcortical changes specific to PD, particularly quantitative susceptibility mapping in the substantia nigra, consistent with the dopaminergic system's role in goal-directed behaviour. GBA1 carrier status was linked to age-related changes in this dimension. Furthermore, PD patients with higher ASRB showed greater volatility in cognitive and motor function, with worsening before diagnosis and subsequent improvement. These findings highlight the complex interplay between psychiatric symptoms, neurobiological changes, and genetic factors in PD, suggesting that specific neuropsychiatric profiles may serve as early indicators of disease risk and progression.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.