Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Advancements in neuroimaging have facilitated unprecedented insights into brain connectivity, making the study of brain effective connectivity networks (ECNs) essential for understanding neurological functions and diseases. Recently, neural networks (NNs) have emerged as powerful tools for ECN estimation due to their prominent universal approximation ability and less reliance on prior knowledge. However, most NN-based approaches fail to eliminate redundant temporal information and lack rigorous causal validation mechanisms. This paper introduces a novel end-to-end framework for estimating ECNs utilising Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression of Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCNs), named the Causal Validation augmented Temporal Convolutional Framework (CVTCF). In the CVTCF, a convolutional Hierarchical Group Lasso (cHGL) is proposed to detect Granger Causality (GC) inputs and eliminate redundant temporal information during GC detection. Additionally, the framework incorporates permutation importance validation based on the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to enhance the reliability of GC detection. The proposed CVTCF generally outperformed state-of-the-art methods in a controlled simulation using the chaotic Lorenz-96 model and the publicly available blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) benchmark dataset. Furthermore, the proposed CVTCF has enabled a detailed analysis of the causal interactions within the cerebral cortex, bringing to light the intricate relationships that underlie neurological functioning and impairment of neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Parkinson's Disease (PD). This study demonstrates the potential of using ECN estimation based on the CVTCF as indicators for neurodegenerative diseases and paves the way for future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.