SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Longitudinal assessment of DNA repair signature trajectory in prodromal versus established Parkinson's disease.

NPJ Parkinsons Dis · 2025-12-05

DOI: 10.1038/s41531-025-01194-7PMID: 41350539

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. DNA repair dysfunction and integrated stress response (ISR) dysregulation have been implicated in PD pathophysiology, however, their role during the prodromal phase remains unclear. We analyzed longitudinal blood transcriptomic data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative to assess DNA repair and ISR genes in healthy individuals, prodromal PD, and those with established PD. Logistic regression classifiers showed that DNA repair and ISR expression distinguished prodromal PD from healthy individuals, with accuracy peaking in later prodromal stages. In contrast, these pathways did not separate established PD from controls, suggesting a more prominent role early in progression. Gene expression variability in prodromal PD was high at baseline but decreased over time, indicating convergence as disease advances. Notably, 50% of DNA repair genes and 74% of ISR genes showed non-linear patterns, suggesting a transient adaptive response fading with progression. Feature importance analysis highlighted several predictors of prodromal PD, including ERCC6, PRIMPOL, NEIL2, and NTHL1. These findings indicate that DNA repair and ISR dysregulation are relevant in prodromal PD and may be biomarkers for early detection and intervention. Future research should validate these results in larger cohorts and evaluate diagnostic and therapeutic potential.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.