SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Remodeling of Perineuronal Nets in the Striato-Cortical Axis in L-DOPA-Induced Dyskinesia Rat Model.

Int J Mol Sci · 2025-12-03

DOI: 10.3390/ijms262311726PMID: 41373871

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID) remains the most challenging complication of dopamine replacement therapy in Parkinson's disease, correlated with maladaptive plasticity within corticostriatal circuits. Perineuronal nets (PNNs), extracellular matrix structures enwrapping mainly parvalbumin interneurons (PV-INs), are key regulators of neuronal stability and plasticity, yet their contribution to LID is unknown. Using a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine rat model of Parkinsonism followed by chronic L-DOPA administration, we quantified PNN-PV associations by Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA) and PV immunolabeling across striatal and motor cortical territories. Dopamine loss markedly reduced PNN density and intensity in the dorsolateral striatum (DLS), which only partially recovered after L-DOPA. In LID, canonical WFA+/PV+ cells remained low, whereas non-canonical WFA-/PV+ populations expanded in both DLS and M1 motor cortex (M1), indicating region-specific remodeling toward a high-plasticity state. To assess causality, we used Chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) for PNN degradation. DLS-targeted ChABC exacerbated abnormal involuntary movements and increased local PV density, while M1-ChABC had no behavioral effect but altered PV metrics within the DLS-M1 axis. These findings identify the DLS as a critical node where PNN fragility amplifies dyskinesia, highlight a functional coupling between striatal and cortical PNN-PV remodeling, and suggest that stabilizing extracellular matrix integrity could mitigate maladaptive plasticity underlying LID.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.