SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Association between motor symptom severity and urinary dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: a retrospective study.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2025-12-12

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1688656PMID: 41459336

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionUrinary dysfunction is a common non-motor symptom in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and is often associated with greater motor disability and reduced quality of life. Despite its clinical relevance, the association between motor symptom severity and urinary dysfunction remains poorly understood. This study aimed to elucidate this relationship using validated clinical questionnaires to assess urinary symptoms.MethodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective cross-sectional study including 223 patients with PD who visited a university hospital between September 2023 and February 2024. Urinary dysfunction was evaluated using the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), comprising the symptom (IPSS-symptom score; Q1-7) and satisfaction (IPSS-satisfaction score; Q8) scores. We analyzed the changes in urinary symptoms, overall satisfaction, and prodromal symptoms across the Hoehn and Yahr (HY) stages. Patients were divided into early (HY ≤ 2) and late (HY > 2) groups to assess early urinary symptom changes.ResultsThe OABSS, IPSS-symptom score, and IPSS-satisfaction score significantly increased with advancing HY stage. Compared to the early group, the late group exhibited significantly higher OABSS (p = 0.015), IPSS-symptom scores (p = 0.002), and IPSS-satisfaction scores (p ConclusionOur study provides evidence that urinary dysfunction intensifies with motor symptom progression in PD. These findings highlight the importance of early detection and proactive management of urinary symptoms in patients with PD to enhance their overall quality of life.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.