Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Background/Objective: Genetic factors contribute significantly to Parkinson's disease (PD), especially in cases with early onset or positive family history. However, previous investigations of the genetic landscape in PD populations were mainly based on targeted genotyping. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of pathogenic variants in known PD-associated genes in a series of Swedish PD patients. Methods: We performed whole-exome sequencing on 285 PD probands from southern Sweden. Our series was enriched for patients with early disease onset or positive family history. We focused on 44 genes previously linked to PD. Results: We identified a CHCHD2 p.(Phe84LeufsTer6) frameshift variant in two unrelated patients and report the first PD case of Swedish ancestry carrying the VPS35 p.(Asp620Asn) variant. Additionally, in one patient each, we found an SNCA duplication, an SNCA p.(Ala53Thr) variant, and a LRRK2 p.(Gly2019Ser) variant. Thus, only 2.1% (n = 6) of patients in this series had Mendelian monogenic PD forms. In addition, forty-three patients carried variants in GBA1, including T369M, which may lack disease-association in our population (n = 12); E326K (n = 22), which is classified as a PD risk variant; as well as N370S (n = 3), R329H (n = 3), S107L (n = 1), and L444P (n = 1), with one patient harboring both T369M and E326K. Pathogenic variants in ARSA, ATP7B, and PRKN genes were also detected in heterozygote form, but their role in PD remains uncertain. Conclusions: Monogenic forms of PD are rare in southern Sweden, even among the familial and early-onset PD patients that were overrepresented in our study. Our findings highlight the genetic diversity in Swedish PD patients and identify key variants for further functional and clinical studies.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.