SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Inflammatory and Neurotrophic Factors and Their Connection to Quality of Life in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy-Single-Center Study.

Int J Mol Sci · 2025-12-17

DOI: 10.3390/ijms262412122PMID: 41465547

Open accessbrief-report; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a condition classified as atypical parkinsonism. Pathologically, it is a four-repeat tauopathy; clinically, it is a disease comprising oculomotor dysfunction, postural instability, akinesia, and cognitive/language disorders. Its pathogenesis is not fully recognized; however, neuroinflammation is considered to likely be a significant aspect, though it is not known whether inflammation is a cause or consequence of neurodegeneration. In this study, the authors analyzed the association between inflammatory/neurotrophic factors and parameters linked to quality of life, based on examinations of 10 controls and 11 patients with PSP. They found a negative correlation between mPSPRS (Modified Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale) and the glial cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor levels (GDNF) (r = -0.772727, p = 0.003) in the serum, a less pronounced negative correlation between progressive supranuclear palsy-quality of life parameter (PSP-QoL) and GDNF (r = -0.68390, p = 0.011) in the serum, and no correlations were observed in the analyses of inflammatory factors. The obtained results show the association between lower levels of GDNF and more pronounced clinical deterioration. Further analysis in the field based on larger groups of patients is required.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.