NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Parkinson's disease (PD) remains without effective disease-modifying therapies, primarily due to limited understanding of its underlying mechanisms. Emerging evidence suggests that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is), commonly used as anti-diabetics, may offer neuroprotective effects. We aimed to evaluate the potential of repurposing DPP-4Is for reducing the PD risk, using a drug-target Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, with specific attention to sex. We performed two-sample MR analyses using instrumental variables (IVs) for DPP-4Is derived from gene expression quantitative trait loci (IVeQTL) and protein QTL (IVpQTL) data sourced from the eQTLGen consortium and UK Biobank, respectively. Associations were tested using the largest PD genome-wide association studies (GWAS) dataset from the International Parkinson's Disease Genomics Consortium, including sex-stratified analyses. Primary analyses used inverse variance weighted MR, with additional sensitivity analyses (alternative MR methods, varying IV selection thresholds, and tissue-specific eQTL), mediation analysis through diabetes and colocalization analysis. Genetically proxied DPP-4 inhibition was associated with reduced PD risk: OR (95% CI) = 1.78 (1.21-2.61) for IVeQTL and 1.21 (1.02-1.45) for IVpQTL. This beneficial effect was more pronounced in men-IVeQTL: 2.25 (1.55-3.28); IVpQTL 1.35 (1.15-1.57)-but not significant in women, suggesting sex-specific effects. Findings were robust across sensitivity analyses and replicated in an independent PD GWAS. Diabetes did not mediate this relationship, and colocalization provided partial evidence for a shared causal variant only in men. This multi-omics drug-target MR study suggests that DPP-4Is may reduce PD risk, supporting their potential for repurposing, particularly in male patients.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.