Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Age-related muscle dysfunction is a major contributor to disability, frailty, and poor clinical outcomes in older adults. Skeletal Muscle Function Deficit (SMFD) framework integrates multiple domains as: muscle mass, muscle density, strength, and power to capture a broader spectrum of age-related muscle dysfunction. The primary aims of these analyses are to develop and validate a composite SMFD score and evaluate its association with key geriatric outcome. This study used data from the InCHIANTI follow-up study, involving an initial cohort of 1035 older participants, with a total of 3196 assessments. The SMFD score was computed by assigning quintile-based values of muscle area, density, strength, and lower limb power. Associations with adverse health outcomes, and major chronic diseases were analyzed using mixed-effects models. The SMFD score declined over time from baseline to the third follow-up was: β ± SE:-0.64 ± 0.12 (p-value < 0.001), β ± SE:-1.94 ± 0.13 (p-value < 0.001), and β ± SE:-4.43 ± 0.14 (p-value < 0.001), respectively, and was associated with: BADL (OR = 0.57; 95 %CI: 0.46-0.69), IADL (OR = 0.70; 95 %CI: 0.66-0.75), poor physical performance (SPPB < 7) (OR = 0.68; 95 %CI: 0.64-0.73), Fried's frailty phenotype (OR = 0.72; 95 % CI: 0.68-0.76), hospitalization (OR = 0.96; 95 %CI: 0.93-0.99), and falls' number (OR = 0.96; 95 %CI: 0.92-0.99). Whereas higher SMFD scores were negatively associated with Parkinson's disease, stroke, and hip osteoarthritis. The SMFD score is a valid, multidimensional measure that predicts adverse outcomes in older adults. It holds promise for use in clinical assessment, risk stratification, and targeted interventions.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.