SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The diagnostic value of transcranial sonography in Swedish parkinsonism patients: A retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up.

Clin Park Relat Disord · 2025-12-06

DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100411PMID: 41479687

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionAlthough transcranial sonography (TCS) assessing hyperechogenic substantia nigra (SN+) as biomarker for Parkinsońs disease (PD) has been introduced elsewhere, the clinical relevance and accuracy in a Swedish population is still unknown.MethodsThis retrospective single-center study included 74 patients with predominantly early-stage parkinsonism at first visit who had been examined by TCS from 2013 to 2017 to determine the SN+ biomarker status in relation to PD, atypical parkinsonian disorders (APS), essential tremor (ET) and vascular/secondary/ unspecified parkinsonism, with the aim of long-term follow-up to confirm the clinical diagnosis. The cut-off value for SN+ was regarded as the 90 % percentile of SN echogenicity in a local healthy cohort (here, 0.23 cm2).ResultsIn 2024, the mean follow-up time was 95 months. Three patients (4 %) without transcranial bone were excluded. SN+ was found in 38/51 patients with finally diagnosed PD and 4/20 patients with other final clinical diagnoses (p 2 vs. 0.23 ± 0.10 [0.18-0.29] cm2, p 0.035).ConclusionAfter a follow-up of up to 8 years, to maximize diagnostic certainty, our findings support the use of TCS as a valuable add-on tool in PD diagnostics in a Swedish patient population, already in the early stage of disease but not for screening.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.