SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Effects of a treadmill and oculomotor dual-task intervention vs. -nordic walking on balance in Parkinson's disease patients - a pilot study.

Clin Park Relat Disord · 2025-09-08

DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100392PMID: 41492353

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundOculomotor function has been established as a critical factor influencing balance, and both domains are frequently impaired in Parkinson's disease (PD). Despite increasing recognition of younger PD cases, targeted therapeutic research remains limited.PurposeThis pilot study evaluated the effects of a treadmill-based oculomotor dual-task intervention in individuals with PD, comparing its impact on balance and non-motor outcomes with that of Nordic walking (NW).MethodUsing a sequential within-subjects design, this study contrasts a four-week NW intervention with a subsequent four-week oculomotor intervention. Baseline, interim, and post-intervention assessments were conducted, with data collected using both qualitative and quantitative measures.ResultsThe treadmill and oculomotor intervention led to greater improvements in unilateral and static balance parameters compared to NW, particularly under horizontal eye-movement conditions. While motor scores improved comparably in both interventions, non-motor domains such as emotional well-being and stigma improved only after the oculomotor protocol.ConclusionTreadmill-based oculomotor dual-task training appears to be a viable and time-efficient alternative to NW for improving specific aspects of balance and non-motor function in PD. Given its indoor feasibility and short duration, this approach may enhance accessibility in clinical and home-based rehabilitation settings.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.