SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Differentiating effects of levodopa and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on motor features in Parkinson disease.

Clin Park Relat Disord · 2025-12-16

DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100417PMID: 41509510

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionWhile deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN DBS) is traditionally used to treat motor fluctuations in Parkinson disease (PD), recent progress in levodopa delivery systems may offer non-invasive alternatives to surgical options. To gain insight into symptoms more likely to be treated effectively by STN DBS or levodopa, we systematically compared the differential effects of levodopa and STN-DBS on specific parkinsonian motor components.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 395 PD patients who received bilateral STN-DBS at Washington University (1999-2020). UPDRS-III was obtained in three conditions: preoperative OFF-medication, preoperative ON-medication, and postoperative ON-DBS/OFF-medication. Exploratory factor analysis identified a consensus structure across conditions. Treatment responses by factor were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and correlations were assessed with Kendall's tau.ResultsBoth treatments significantly improved all motor features. STN-DBS showed slightly superior efficacy for upper body tremor (mean change: -3.84 vs -3.43, p ConclusionLevodopa and STN-DBS demonstrate similar but distinct therapeutic profiles across parkinsonian motor domains. However, weak correlations between treatment modalities for all motor features challenge the utility of levodopa responsiveness for DBS candidacy and support individualization of treatment selection based on symptom profile.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.