Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Parkinson's disease (PD), characterized by dopaminergic neuron loss, still lacks disease-modifying therapies due to incompletely understood mechanisms. Guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) are well-known immune regulators, but their roles in PD are largely unknown. In this study, we identify GBP2 as a critical driver of PD pathogenesis by impairing mitophagy. We found that GBP2 was significantly upregulated in the substantia nigra of PD patients, and in both MPTP-induced and A53T transgenic mouse models, as well as in MPP+-treated or A53T α-synuclein-overexpressing SH-SY5Y cells. Both in vivo and in vitro, genetic knockdown of GBP2 robustly alleviated the MPTP/MPP+-induced motor deficits, dopaminergic neuron loss, and apoptosis. Mechanistically, PD-related stress promotes GBP2 geranylgeranylation, driving its mitochondrial accumulation. At mitochondria, GBP2 directly binds the mitophagy receptor NIX via its large GTPase domain and targets it for ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation, thereby suppressing NIX-mediated mitophagy. Accordingly, GBP2 knockdown enhanced mitophagy, improved mitochondrial homeostasis, and protected against neuronal apoptosis. The neuroprotective effects of GBP2 knockdown were abolished by either pharmacological inhibition of mitophagy or genetic knockdown of NIX, indicating a linear pathway. Importantly, therapeutically targeting geranylgeranylation with GGTI298 significantly attenuated MPTP-induced neurotoxicity. Our study unveils a novel, druggable axis in PD pathogenesis where GBP2 disrupts mitochondrial quality control. Targeting GBP2 geranylgeranylation with GGTI298 presents a promising therapeutic strategy.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.