SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Magnetoencephalography-based prediction of longitudinal symptom progression in Parkinson's disease.

NPJ Parkinsons Dis · 2026-01-22

DOI: 10.1038/s41531-025-01240-4PMID: 41571668

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Motor dysfunction in Parkinson's disease (PD) has been linked to widespread oscillatory changes within the basal ganglia-thalamic-cortical network, particularly in the beta frequency range. However, the evolution of cortical neurophysiological alterations and their relationship to clinical progression remain poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG) study in 27 persons with PD and 30 healthy individuals with a mean follow-up time of 4 years. Source-reconstructed MEG data were parcellated into cortical regions, from which power spectra were parameterized to separate oscillatory peaks from the aperiodic component. An increase in the aperiodic exponent in the left postcentral region was associated with progression of rigidity. Peak beta power in parieto-temporo-occipital regions was elevated at baseline, correlating with less severe bradykinesia. This negative relationship weakened over time in patients with progressive symptoms, suggesting an association with compensatory mechanisms. Using partial least squares regression to predict future disease course from baseline neurophysiological features, 19.5% of the variability in motor progression was explained in an independent validation cohort. Our results emphasize the importance of separating aperiodic neural activity from periodic oscillations as a progressive alteration of the aperiodic component represented the most prominent PD-related neurophysiological change. Further, our findings highlight the potential predictive value of resting-state neurophysiology for future disease progression.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.