NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Background/Objectives: Speech and motor control share overlapping neural mechanisms, yet their quantitative relationships in Parkinson's disease (PD) remain underexplored. This study investigated bidirectional associations between acoustic voice features and objective motor metrics to better understand how vocal and motor systems relate in PD. Methods: Cross-sectional baseline data from participants in a randomized neuromodulation trial were analyzed (n = 13). Motor performance was captured using an Integrated Motion Analysis Suite (IMAS), which enabled quantitative, objective characterization of motor performance during balance, gait, and upper- and lower-limb tasks. Acoustic analyses included harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR), smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS), jitter, shimmer, median fundamental frequency (F0), F0 standard deviation (SD F0), and voice intensity. Univariate linear regressions were conducted in both directions (voice ↔ motor), as well as partial correlations controlling for PD motor symptom severity. Results: When modeling voice outcomes, faster motor performance and shorter movement durations were associated with acoustically clearer voice features (e.g., higher elbow flexion-extension peak speed with higher voice HNR, β = 8.5, R2 = 0.56, p = 0.01). Similarly, when modeling motor outcomes, clearer voice measures were linked with faster movement speed and shorter movement durations (e.g., higher voice HNR with higher peak movement speed in elbow flexion/extension, β = 0.07, R2 = 0.56, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Voice and motor measures in PD showed significant bidirectional associations, suggesting shared sensorimotor control. These exploratory findings, while limited by sample size, support the feasibility of integrated multimodal assessment for future longitudinal studies.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.