SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

WearGait-PD: An Open-Access Wearables Dataset for Gait in Parkinson's Disease and Age-Matched Controls.

Sci Data · 2026-02-12

DOI: 10.1038/s41597-026-06806-2PMID: 41680227

Open accessDataset; data-paper; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Wearable movement sensors are powerful tools for objectively characterizing and quantifying movement. They enhance the precise characterization of gait, balance, and motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease and related disorders, facilitating in-clinic and remote assessments, disease management, and therapeutic intervention development. Access to high-quality data from these sensors can accelerate discoveries in this clinical population. The WearGait-PD open-access dataset contains raw inertial measurement unit (IMU) and sensorized insole data from 100 individuals with PD and 85 age-matched controls, synchronized to a gait walkway reference system. IMU data include 3-degree of freedom (DOF) acceleration, rotational velocity, magnetic field strength, and orientation for each of 13 sensors on the participant's body. Sensor insole data include absolute pressure from 16 sensors in each insole and 3-DOF acceleration and rotational velocity. Walkway data include 2D position and relative pressure for each active sensor during every footfall. Frame-by-frame annotation of participant actions during gait and balance tasks was incorporated using synchronized video cameras. All data were associated with demographic information and clinical evaluations (e.g., medications, DBS-status, MDS-UPDRS scores).

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.