NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is increasingly recognized as a multisystem disorder in which metabolic dysfunction may contribute to disease susceptibility and progression. Peripheral insulin resistance (IR) has been implicated in PD, but data in levodopa-naïve patients are currently limited. Objective: To investigate the prevalence of IR and metabolic dysfunction in early-stage, levodopa-naïve PD patients and their association with clinical features. Methods: We conducted an exploratory case-control study including 20 levodopa-naïve PD patients and 40 age-, sex-, and BMI-matched healthy controls. Participants underwent comprehensive clinical and metabolic assessments, including fasting glucose, insulin, lipid profiles, and HOMA-IR calculation. Peripheral IR was defined using HOMA-IR cut-offs of ≥2.0 (primary analysis) and ≥2.5 (sensitivity analysis). ANCOVA adjusted for age, sex, and BMI was used for between-group comparisons. Results: PD patients exhibited higher fasting insulin (10.7 ± 5.2 vs. 8.0 ± 4.4 µIU/mL; p = 0.020) and HOMA-IR (2.63 ± 1.40 vs. 1.89 ± 1.21; p = 0.014) compared to controls. Using a HOMA-IR ≥ 2.0, IR prevalence was 70% in PD vs. 32.5% in controls (OR = 4.85, 95% CI 1.52-15.50, p = 0.012). ANCOVA analysis confirmed group differences after adjusting for covariates (respectively, p = 0.032 for insulin and p = 0.023 for HOMA-IR). A sensitivity analysis excluding six patients receiving dopaminergic therapy further supported the robustness of the results. No significant correlations were observed between IR and disease severity scores. Conclusions: Early-stage, levodopa-naïve PD patients exhibit a higher prevalence of peripheral insulin resistance compared with matched controls. These findings support the hypothesis that metabolic dysfunction is an intrinsic component of PD pathophysiology and may represent a target for early intervention.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.