SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Exploring biomechanical differences between brain-first and body-first Parkinson's disease subtypes using shear wave elastography: a pilot cross-sectional study.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2026-02-02

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2026.1706502PMID: 41704953

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveThis exploratory study aimed to investigate whether ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) could quantify rigidity in Parkinson's disease (PD) and assess potential biomechanical differences between the brain-first and body-first subtypes.MethodsShear wave elastography was used to measure the Young's modulus (YM) and shear wave velocity (SWV) of the biceps brachii in 70 healthy controls (HCs) and 102 patients with PD (40 classified as body-first, 62 classified as brain-first based on RBDSQ criteria). Group comparisons were conducted using t-tests or ANOVA, correlations were assessed via Pearson or Spearman tests, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsYoung's modulus and SWV values were significantly higher in PD patients than in HCs (all p p p ConclusionShear wave elastography is a sensitive tool for quantifying rigidity in PD. This pilot study provides the first evidence of a significant difference in muscle biomechanical properties between PD subgroups classified according to current clinical criteria. While SWE shows promise as a supplementary biomarker, its integration with established subtyping markers (e.g., polysomnography, MIBG scintigraphy) in future multimodal and longitudinal studies is essential to determine its role in clinical subtyping.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.