SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Long-term efficacy and disease-specific responsiveness to protirelin in patients with spinocerebellar degeneration: A retrospective study.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2026-02-11

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2026.108238PMID: 41722180

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionThe thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) analog protirelin has short-term benefits for cerebellar ataxia (CA), but its long-term efficacy and the subtype-specific responsiveness of spinocerebellar degeneration (SCD) patients remain unclear.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 92 SCD patients (273 courses) treated with protirelin between July 2011 and October 2025, including patients with idiopathic CA (IDCA), multiple system atrophy with predominant CA (MSA-C) or parkinsonism (MSA-P), and genetic subtypes including spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) type 6, SCA31 and dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA). Responders were defined as showing ≥1-point improvement on the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA).ResultsProtirelin was effective in 64.1% of subjects, with significant improvement overall (p ConclusionProtirelin is efficacious in SCD patients and well-tolerated, particularly in slow-progressing phenotypes (IDCA and SCA31); its benefit in rapidly progressing ataxias (MSA-C) may be confined to early disease stages. Prospective studies with standardized dosing and long-term follow-up are warranted to establish evidence-based protocols for TRH-related therapy for CA.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.