Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectiveGait impairment is a distinctive symptom of Parkinson's disease that negatively impact mobility. We assessed the validity of wearable digital insoles against a validated reference gait analysis system for measuring select gait characteristics in patients with Parkinson's disease.MethodsA comparative analysis between digital insoles (Moticon ReGo Insole) and the GAITRite system was conducted in patients with Parkinson's disease. Patients were assessed in both the OFF and ON medication states. Gait characteristics were measured simultaneously with both systems during two 10 m walk tests. Patients also completed a patient experience survey following the use of the digital insoles.ResultsOverall, 21 patients with Parkinson's disease were included in the study. Analytical validation for gait cadence, speed, and stride length showed excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients between 0.93-0.97) in both the OFF and ON states. Stance, swing, and double support times exhibited lower validity with moderate agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients from 0.48-0.57). Gait speed and stride length were significantly associated with scores on the Movement Disorders Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (p = 0.0085 and 0.013, respectively). Mean differences in all parameters measured with the insoles, except cadence, were significantly different between OFF and ON states (p InterpretationThese findings support the validity of Moticon ReGo digital insoles for the assessment of several important gait characteristics in Parkinson's disease.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.