SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Mitochondrial insertions/deletions (INDELs) burden in Parkinson's disease: an analysis from a Brazilian cohort.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2026-02-20

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2026.108250PMID: 41734430

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionMitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) alterations are increasingly associated with Parkinson's disease (PD), particularly due to their role in oxidative stress. However, the contribution of mtDNA insertions and deletions (INDELs) to PD remains poorly understood, particularly in genetically admixed populations such as Brazilians.MethodsTo explore this, we sequenced the complete mtDNA from blood samples of 179 admixed individuals from the Brazilian Amazon (104 people with PD and 75 controls). Data processing included FastQC, MultiQC, FastP, BWA, and mtDNA-Server 2.ResultsWe identified a significantly higher burden of mtDNA INDELs in PD compared with controls in Complex I genes (OR = 9.23; 95% CI: 2.22-63.55; FDR = 0.044). Differences in heteroplasmy levels were also observed in the ATP6, ND4, and ND5 genes. Importantly, we discovered seven new PD-associated INDELs (m.13763_13763delinsCCA, m.13885_13885delinsCTG, m.13888_13890delinsT, m.13767_13769delinsC, m.13810_13812delinsG, m.13813_13813delinsGCA, and m.13764_13764delinsCAT) that are particularly more frequent among individuals harboring uniparental lineages of Native American origin.ConclusionOur findings report novel mtDNA INDELs, particularly in Complex I, which may contribute to PD susceptibility and highlight the importance of investigating mitochondrial genomic variation in underrepresented populations. These associations should be interpreted as preliminary, and further longitudinal studies with independent cohorts are required to confirm these observations.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.