SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Withdrawal Syndrome in Parkinson's Disease Patients After Cessation of Deep Brain Stimulation.

Diagnostics (Basel) · 2026-02-23

DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics16040644PMID: 41750792

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background: Abrupt cessation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD), most commonly due to implantable pulse generator (IPG) battery depletion, may lead to DBS withdrawal syndrome (DBS-WDS). However, withdrawal syndrome does not occur in all patients following stimulation cessation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 210 PD patients treated with DBS. Patients with documented stimulation cessation were evaluated for the presence of withdrawal syndrome based on established clinical criteria. Demographic, disease-related, and treatment characteristics were assessed, and descriptive analysis was conducted on severe cases requiring intensive care. Results: DBS battery shutdown occurred in 28 patients (13.3%). Most patients did not develop withdrawal syndrome and experienced only transient motor worsening. Severe DBS-WDS requiring intensive care was rare, occurring in only three patients (1.4%). Battery shutdown alone did not predict withdrawal, nor was preoperative levodopa equivalent daily dose associated with withdrawal risk. Conclusions: DBS battery shutdown is usually not accompanied by withdrawal syndrome, and severe DBS-WDS is uncommon. Proactive battery management may help to prevent this rare but serious complication.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.