SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Rapid Profiling of EEG Responses to Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Biomarker-Driven Screening Framework.

Biomedicines · 2026-02-03

DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines14020352PMID: 41751251

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background/Objectives: Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with alterations in resting-state Electroencephalogram (EEG) biomarkers. Identifying stimulation protocols that reliably shift these biomarkers toward healthy-like patterns is essential for developing personalized neuromodulation strategies. This study introduces a rapid, biomarker-driven framework for screening the EEG effects of diverse Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) waveforms in PD. Methods: More than 300 subthreshold GVS stimuli were delivered during resting-state EEG to PD (n = 5) subjects and Healthy Controls (n = 5). A composite biomarker score that included spectral, cross-frequency, aperiodic, and complexity measures quantified stimulation-related changes. A linear classifier and multi-criteria decision analysis were used to evaluate and rank stimuli. Results: Stimulation produced consistent improvements in the composite biomarker score, with the strongest effects observed for beta-range sinusoids, multisine waveforms, frequency-modulated stimuli with a 75 Hz carrier, and PAC-modulated signals. No significant post-stimulation carryover effects were detected. Conclusions: While preliminary, this exploratory framework enables rapid, interpretable profiling of EEG responses to non-invasive stimulation in PD. By prioritizing candidate GVS protocols based on biomarker shifts rather than behavioural endpoints, the approach provides a practical foundation for future personalized neuromodulation strategies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.