SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Cognitive load alters cortical dynamics during gait in Parkinson's disease but not in neurologically healthy individuals.

Cogn Neurodyn · 2026-02-25

DOI: 10.1007/s11571-026-10424-4PMID: 41767408

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The level of difficulty of a secondary cognitive task (DT) can affect gait and cortical activity distinctly in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). During a simpler ST, individuals with PD may use a compensatory neural mechanism by reallocating neural resources to preserve gait performance; for difficult DT, this compensation may not be the case. However, whether different levels of difficulty of a single-domain DT would distinctively affect gait and cortical activity in individuals with PD compared to neurologically healthy individuals is still unknown. Fourteen individuals with PD and 14 healthy individuals performed walking trials at self-selected speed, under six conditions of walking with an auditory DT and varying levels of difficulty (very easy: VE-SCT, easy: E-SCT, moderate: M-SCT, difficult: D-SCT, and very difficult: VD-SCT). Gait kinematics and cortical activity data were recorded. RM-ANOVAs identified that individuals with PD showed higher DT cost for both step length and step velocity when the cognitive task was D-SCT or VD-SCT, compared to easier tasks (p p < 0.005). These findings suggest that individuals with PD exhibit a distinct pattern of cognitive-motor interaction during dual-task walking, characterized by increased cortical dual-task cost in lower vs. greater gait deterioration in higher task demands. These findings suggest that individuals with PD over-engage cognitive resources while walking with relatively easier DT.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.