SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Impaired processing of time-critical language information in Parkinson's disease.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2026-03-03

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2026.108263PMID: 41785667

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) disturbs basal ganglia functioning and the precise coding of time-critical information. Beyond its known impact on movement capacities, it may therefore affect cognitive functions with high demands of temporal information coordination. We studied this via the processing of syntactic boundaries during auditory sentence parsing.ObjectiveTo analyze the processing of syntactic structure as a function of position and duration of prosodic breaks in persons with PD compared to controls.Methods27 persons with PD and 26 healthy controls judged the grammatical correctness of auditorily presented sentences. Prosodic breaks, occurred at syntactically grammatical or ungrammatical positions, with either short or prolonged duration. Accuracy and decision time were analyzed as a function of break position and length. As motor baseline, an auditory reaction time task was included to control for slowness of movement.ResultsPersons with PD compared to controls made more errors and slower judgments for both correct and incorrect sentences. For incorrect sentences, however, the prolongation of breaks enhanced the judgment accuracy in PD, eliminating statistical group differences. PD-related abnormalities of task performance were not correlated with the motor severity, duration, or other cognitive aspects of the disease. Prolonged reaction time could not be explained by PD-related motor slowing.ConclusionImpaired temporal sequencing of auditory language input declines sentence parsing in PD. This calls for higher awareness of perceptual deficits of linguistic processing in clinical routine.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.