SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Pedunculopontine-thalamic cholinergic projections in rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder.

NPJ Parkinsons Dis · 2026-03-06

DOI: 10.1038/s41531-026-01311-0PMID: 41792162

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Cholinergic system degeneration is a hallmark of Lewy body disease, including Parkinson's disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), but its involvement in prodromal stages, particularly regarding pedunculopontine-thalamic projections, remains unclear. This study investigated cholinergic pathway integrity in isolated REM sleep behaviour disorder (iRBD) and its relation to phenoconversion risk. We analyzed data from 146 iRBD patients and 102 controls from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative using T1-weighted MRI for basal forebrain volume and diffusion-weighted imaging for three cholinergic pathways: lateral and medial nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM)-cortical pathways and pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN)-thalamic pathways. Bayesian mixed models and Cox proportional hazards models assessed group differences, cognitive associations, and phenoconversion risk. Fractional anisotropy along PPN-thalamic pathways was reduced in iRBD, particularly in the left hemisphere. Within iRBD patients, medial NBM pathway integrity correlated with baseline cognitive performance. Reduced PPN-thalamic integrity predicted increased phenoconversion risk (hazard ratio=2.08). No group differences or associations with phenoconversion were found for NBM-cortical pathways or basal forebrain volume. These findings suggest that brainstem-thalamic cholinergic projections may be affected earlier than the basal forebrain system in Lewy body disease, potentially serving as a sensitive marker for phenoconversion risk in iRBD pending validation in longer follow-up studies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.