SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Kenny is the adaptor protein for ubiquitin-dependent mitophagy in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>.

Autophagy Rep · 2026-03-04

DOI: 10.1080/27694127.2026.2638025PMID: 41799850

Open accessarticle-commentary; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Mitophagy is the selective degradation program for damaged and unnecessary mitochondria to maintain cellular mitostasis and survival. Specific mutations in the mediators for the canonical ubiquitin (ub)-dependent mitophagy pathway have been identified with unique neurological diseases like Parkinson disease and ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), metabolic diseases, and cancer. Mammalian OPTN (optineurin) has been shown as a SAR (selective autophagy receptor) for ub-dependent mitophagy in vitro with direct connections of its mutations with glaucoma and ALS. Despite the in vitro demonstration of OPTN's role in mitophagy, the in vivo physiological characterization of OPTN's mitophagy function is largely unexplored. In our recent study, we provide in vivo evidence that the Drosophila melanogaster (Dm) protein, Kenny, directly mediates the sequestration of target mitochondria for the progression and completion of ub-dependent mitophagy. This result establishes Kenny as the Dm homolog of OPTN. Previously, Kenny had only been characterized for its role in innate immune activation and modulation. The conclusion from this study provides avenues for further understanding the in vivo signaling regulating Kenny's role in mitophagy and investigating homologous disease-relevant mutations of OPTN in Dm.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.