SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Dose-Dependent Neuroprotective Effects of Valproate on Motor Function and Striatal D2 Receptor Stability in a 6-OHDA Rat Model of Parkinson's Disease.

Int J Mol Sci · 2026-03-01

DOI: 10.3390/ijms27052320PMID: 41828543

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by progressive degeneration of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons, leading to motor dysfunction and compensatory postsynaptic dopamine receptor alterations. Valproic acid (VPA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, has shown neuroprotective properties; however, its dose-dependent effects on dopaminergic integrity and dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) regulation remain unclear. Adult male Wistar rats received VPA (200 or 400 mg/kg, p.o.) or vehicle for 20 days prior to unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesioning. Motor performance was evaluated using the beam balance test, exploratory behavior in the open field, striatal dopamine levels by PLC-electrochemical detection, and D2R protein expression by Western blot. The 6-OHDA lesion induced marked motor deficits, reduced striatal dopamine content, and significantly increased D2R expression. VPA at 200 mg/kg produced only minor, non-significant effects. In contrast, VPA at 400 mg/kg preserved motor performance, attenuated dopamine depletion, and normalized striatal D2R expression. These findings demonstrate a clear dose-dependent neuroprotective effect of VPA and indicate that stabilization of postsynaptic D2R expression accompanies preservation of dopaminergic terminals in the 6-OHDA rat model.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.