SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Early intestinal barrier changes in A53T transgenic Parkinson's disease mice.

Cell Tissue Res · 2026-03-24

DOI: 10.1007/s00441-026-04062-9PMID: 41872639

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Gut dysfunction commonly precedes motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD), but the mechanistic sequence of gut versus brain pathology remains unclear. This work aimed to define the timing of intestinal barrier dysfunction relative to central nervous system (CNS) changes in the A53T α-synuclein transgenic mouse model of PD. Functional and molecular assessments of the gastrointestinal tract (ileum and colon) were conducted at 12 and 36 weeks. We measured in vivo and ex vivo intestinal permeability, nutrient absorption, histomorphology, goblet cell density, and expression of MUC2 and Claudin-1. Inflammatory markers (CRP, TNF-α, CD45) were quantified in plasma and gut tissues. A53T mice exhibited increased intestinal permeability at 12 and 36 weeks, with transiently elevated ex vivo transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) at 12 weeks. Nutrient absorption remained intact. Morphological changes included widened villi and crypts, altered mucin expression, and early reductions in Claudin-1 in the ileum and the colon while inflammatory markers remained largely unchanged. These findings suggest that gut dysfunction precedes known central pathology in A53T mice, supporting further investigation into the gut as an early site of pathology and a potential therapeutic target in PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.