SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Pan-neurodegeneration proteomics reveals disease subtypes and molecular signatures.

Cell · 2026-03-23

DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2026.02.026PMID: 41875888

Check source for accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) pose clinical challenges due to their complexity and molecular heterogeneity. Here, we present a pan-neurodegeneration atlas (PanNDA) from multilayer, deep proteomic analysis of 2,279 human brain samples spanning 6 major NDs: Alzheimer's disease (AD), Lewy body dementia (LBD), frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 pathology, progressive supranuclear palsy with tau pathology, vascular dementia, and Parkinson's disease. PanNDA integrates data from whole proteome, detergent-insoluble proteome, and posttranslational modifications (phosphorylation and ubiquitination), enabling intra- and inter-disease comparisons. Intra-disease analyses uncover distinct molecular subtypes (e.g., three in AD and four in LBD), reveal dysregulated pathways, and prioritize top-ranked proteins. Inter-disease comparisons identify shared alterations in NDs, such as GPNMB in microglial and lysosomal activation and NPTX2 in synaptic regulation, alongside disease-specific changes and hub regulators within protein networks. Overall, PanNDA provides a systems-level framework for understanding ND mechanisms and serves as a foundational resource that is accessible via an interactive website: https://penglab.shinyapps.io/pannda.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.