SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Transcranial Sonography in the Examination of Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes.

Biomedicines · 2026-02-27

DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines14030530PMID: 41898177

Open accessother; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Transcranial sonography is one of the methods of examination used in atypical parkinsonian syndromes. The assessment is not indicated in the diagnostic criteria of entities in this group e.g., Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Corticobasal Degeneration, Multiple System Atrophy and Dementia with Lewy Bodies. Atypical parkinsonisms are a group of diseases affected by diverse pathologies including alpha-synuclein or tau among others. Recently broader attention was brought to less common atypical parkinsonisms as Perry syndrome. Atypical parkinsonisms are related to poor response to levodopa treatment, rapid deterioration and unfavorable prognosis. Additionally, the entities often overlap in terms of clinical manifestation, especially in the early stages. Though atypical parkinsonisms are affected by the lack of possibility of obtaining definite in vivo diagnosis, growing interest is associated to supplementary evaluations including neuroimaging. Among these methods could be mentioned magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography and transcranial sonography. Transcranial sonography is associated with high accessibility and low cost. The goal of this paper is to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of transcranial sonography in the examination of atypical parkinsonisms.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.