Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with progressive gait deterioration; however, widely used clinical scales such as the Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) stage are limited in capturing continuous severity changes due to subjectivity and discrete grading. This study proposes a two-stage explainable AI framework using vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) signals to achieve reproducible PD detection and continuous severity estimation. In the first stage, three deep learning models, temporal convolutional network (TCN), BiGRU with attention, and FCNN-Transformer, were trained using windowed VGRF signals under repeated subject-wise data segmentation. All models achieved high discrimination performance (AUC ≥ 0.93), with FCNN-Transformer showing the highest mean AUC (0.940) and statistically superior performance (paired Wilcoxon test, p p p R2 = 0.953). This shows that gait-based features are a sensitive enough signal to continuously quantify disease progression. In addition, in the TREND prospective longitudinal cohort (n = 696), wearable walking indicators differed significantly from those of non-patients prior to diagnosis, and a decline in walking pace was observed approximately four years before Parkinson's disease diagnosis, providing the basis for early screening and monitoring using gait-based digital biomarkers. These results demonstrate that gait-based digital biomarkers can objectively quantify both PD presence and disease progression. The proposed framework provides a reproducible, explainable, and clinically interpretable AI-based decision support approach for PD assessment.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.