SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Sensor-Based Assessment of Asymmetry in Upper Limb Bradykinesia Among Patients With Parkinson's Disease and Scans Without Evidence of Dopaminergic Deficit (SWEDD).

Parkinsons Dis · 2026-04-01

DOI: 10.1155/padi/6400390PMID: 41928915

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundBilateral motor asymmetry is a hallmark feature of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, few studies have quantitatively examined this feature in patients with scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD). This study aimed to investigate upper limb asymmetry in bradykinesia among PD and SWEDD patients using gyro sensors, focusing on finger tapping and forearm rotation task.MethodsWe recruited 23 early-stage, drug-naïve PD patients, 23 SWEDD patients, and 20 age-matched healthy controls. We recorded gyro sensor signals during 15-s finger tapping and forearm rotation tasks. Bilateral asymmetry indices were calculated and compared among groups. In addition, repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the interaction of task and group, and Spearman correlation analysis was conducted with clinical motor scores.ResultsNo significant group differences were found during finger tapping. However, during forearm rotation, PD patients exhibited significantly greater asymmetry than SWEDD patients in several indices, including RMS angular velocity, peak angular displacement, peak power, and total power. Task × group interaction effects were significant only in forearm rotation, and asymmetry indices from forearm rotation showed significant correlations with clinical motor scores.ConclusionsForearm rotation is a sensitive task for detecting motor asymmetry in PD and for differentiating PD from SWEDD. These results suggest that quantitative motor asymmetry indices using wearable sensors could aid clinicians in the identification of potential SWEDD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.