SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The mechanism of external cueing interventions in improving freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: an fNIRS study.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2026-03-20

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2026.1776882PMID: 41938069

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionExternal cue interventions can effectively improve gait disturbances in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) and Freezing of Gait (FOG). However, the cortical mechanisms underlying cueing modulation of gait have rarely been investigated.ObjectivesWe aimed to compare gait performance and cerebral hemodynamic responses in patients with PD and FOG (PD-FOG) under different cueing interventions, and to further elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying the effects of different cues on gait by contrasting these findings with those of Healthy Controls (HCs).MethodsTwenty-eight PD-FOG patients and 28 HCs were enrolled. Gait parameters were measured during the walking experiment under Rhythmic Visual Cue (RVC) and Rhythmic Auditory Cue (RAC) to compare how these cues affect gait. Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) was employed to measure changes in oxyhemoglobin concentration (∆HbO2). Additionally, inter-channel connectivity strength was calculated to evaluate Functional Connectivity (FC) across various Regions of Interest (ROIs).ResultsPD-FOG patients exhibit features including decreased gait velocity and stride length during freezing episodes. Both RVC and RAC enhance gait velocity and stride length. Conversely, the combined RVC and RAC (RVC + RAC) intervention did not produce meaningful changes in gait. Compared to HCs, PD-FOG patients show significantly lower ∆HbO2 in the Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) and Primary Somatosensory Cortex (S1). Both RVC and RAC interventions increase ∆HbO2 in the PFC and S1 in PD-FOG patients, whereas the RVC + RAC intervention decreases ∆HbO2 in the Premotor Cortex (PMC). Furthermore, compared with HCs, PD-FOG patients show increased FC between the S1-PFC and Primary Motor Cortex (M1)-PFC. The RVC intervention enhances FC within the PFC and between the PMC and the Visual Association Cortex (V2). The RAC intervention strengthens FC within the PFC and the PFC-Middle Temporal Gyrus (MTG). The RVC + RAC intervention increases FC within the PFC-MTG and PFC-PMC, partially compensating for functional deficits associated with cortical hypoactivation by enhancing connectivity among these ROIs.ConclusionSingle visual or auditory cues can improve FOG symptoms. RVC and RAC alleviate FOG by modulating cortical activation and enhancing FC between key ROIs. The heightened connectivity among these ROIs may represent the underlying neural pathway that mediates the cue-induced alleviation of FOG.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.