SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Dysregulation of astrocytic DNAJC6 contributes to sporadic Parkinson's disease pathogenesis.

J Clin Invest · 2026-04-09

DOI: 10.1172/jci194989PMID: 41955024

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Loss-of-function mutations in DNAJC6, encoding the cochaperone auxilin (HSP40 family), cause familial juvenile-onset Parkinson's disease (PD). Given the chaperone role of DNAJC6 in cellular homeostasis in adult neurons, we hypothesized that DNAJC6 dysfunction may not be limited to juvenile-onset disorders but could also be associated with adult-onset brain diseases. Here, we show that DNAJC6 expression is significantly downregulated in postmortem substantia nigra tissues and transcriptomic datasets from patients with late-onset sporadic PD. Consistently, human pluripotent stem cell-derived midbrain cultures exhibited reduced DNAJC6 expression under multiple PD-associated conditions. Mechanistically, DNAJC6 loss resulted from impaired transcription mediated by the midbrain-specific factors NURR1/FOXA2 and reduced protein stability regulated by LRRK2. Beyond neurons, DNAJC6 was robustly expressed in astrocytes and similarly downregulated in sporadic PD contexts. Astrocytic DNAJC6 deficiency impaired phagocytic, autolysosomal, and mitochondrial functions while promoting a proinflammatory phenotype, thereby exacerbating neurodegenerative pathology. Importantly, epigenetic restoration of DNAJC6 in neurons and astrocytes using a CRISPRa-AAV9 system in the substantia nigra of an α-synuclein-induced PD mouse model alleviated behavioral deficits and neuropathology. These findings provide evidence that DNAJC6 dysregulation is associated with pathogenic processes in sporadic PD and suggest that targeting neuronal and astrocytic DNAJC6 could represent a potential disease-modifying strategy.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.