SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Distinguishing Gait Patterns in PD Patients Under Different Treatments via Recurrence Plots and Vision Transformer Fusion.

IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol · 2026-02-23

DOI: 10.1109/ojemb.2026.3667045PMID: 41970652

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Goal: This study aims to develop an innovative gait analysis framework using recurrence plots (RPs) to differentiate gait patterns between Parkinson's disease (PD) patients under varying treatment regimes and healthy individuals. Methods: Pressure sensor data were transformed into RPs and analyzed using a Vision Transformer (ViT) model with multiple fusion strategies. To address class imbalance, a conditional Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network (DC-GAN) was employed to generate synthetic gait data. Four ViT-based fusion architectures were investigated and evaluated across multi-class and binary classification tasks. Results: The dual ViT stream with late fusion achieved the highest accuracy in multi-class classification (94.58%), while the cross-attention fusion model outperformed others in binary classification tasks. Conclusions: The findings indicate that gait characteristics captured via RPs can effectively distinguish between PD patients under different treatments and healthy controls. This approach provides a data-driven pathway for objective and individualized assessment of PD therapies, potentially supporting improved clinical decision-making.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.