SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Lower serum uric acid levels as a risk factor for depression in prodromal Parkinson's disease: a cohort study.

Open Life Sci · 2026-01-01

DOI: 10.1515/biol-2025-1309PMID: 42046555

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Depression, as an important prodromal non-motor manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD), its early predictive indicators remain unclear. Although cross-sectional studies suggest an association between serum uric acid (UA) levels and depression in PD, longitudinal evidence in the prodromal period is lacking. This study innovatively conducted a 5-year longitudinal study in a population with prodromal Parkinson's disease (pPD), revealing for the first time the longitudinal association between serum UA levels and the development of depression. At baseline, we selected 460 pPD patients from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database. Eventually, 61 participants completed a 5-year longitudinal study with annual assessments. Predictor variables were selected through univariate Cox analysis and LASSO regression, with multivariate Cox regression models employed to assess the independent association between serum UA levels and incident depression in the pPD cohort. At baseline, 18.9 % of pPD patients developed depression, and the cumulative incidence rates of depression during the 5-year follow-up period were 34.43 %, 49.18 %, 57.38 %, 62.30 % and 63.93 %, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjusted for covariates including sex and age, identified a higher Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part I (MDS-UPDRS I) score (HR = 1.177, 95 % CI 1.093-1.267, P P = 0.029) as independent risk factors for incident depression in the pPD cohort. Our study shows that lower serum UA levels can independently predict the risk of depression in pPD, providing a new biomarker for the early identification of high-risk populations.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.