SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Socio-Occupational Functioning after Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.

Mov Disord Clin Pract · 2026-05-01

DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.70661PMID: 42068100

Open accessbrief-report; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundSocio-occupational functioning in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is not fully captured by standard motor and quality-of-life scales.ObjectivesTo characterize patient-reported socio-occupational functioning after STN-DBS and explore associated clinical and demographic factors.MethodsThirty-four PD patients were assessed 9-18 months postoperatively using a semi-structured interview covering socio-occupational domains. A composite mean score (Q_mean) was computed as a descriptive index, with clinical associations explored using univariate screening and multivariate linear regression.ResultsThe Q_mean score following STN-DBS was 7.66 ± 0.86 (range 6.00-9.57). In exploratory multivariate analysis, female sex (n = 7) was associated with higher functioning (P = 0.003), whereas GBA variants (n = 5) with lower functioning (P = 0.007).DiscussionPerceived socio-occupational functioning was overall satisfactory at postoperative assessment, with limited association with conventional motor/neuropsychiatric measures, and greater association with individual factors such as sex and genetic background. These exploratory findings support inclusion of socio-occupational perspectives in DBS outcome evaluation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.