SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Motor-Derived Digital Biomarkers for Identifying Low-MoCA Status in People with Parkinson's Disease.

Sensors (Basel) · 2026-04-18

DOI: 10.3390/s26082503PMID: 42076613

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Cognitive impairment is a prevalent non-motor manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD), yet early detection remains limited by the sensitivity of conventional cognitive assessments. Emerging evidence suggests that motor dysfunction, particularly gait and balance abnormalities, reflects underlying cognitive vulnerability. This study examined motor-cognitive associations and evaluated whether motor-derived features can be used to classify low-MoCA status in PD without direct cognitive testing. Data from 102 individuals with PD were analyzed, incorporating clinical assessments, physical function measures, lifestyle factors, and gait-derived biomarkers. Multiple regression identified Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III, stride length of the more affected side during 360° turning at preferred speed, and maximum ankle jerk on the less affected side during forward walking as independent predictors of Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores, collectively explaining 34.7% of the variance. Network analysis revealed integrative relationships among global motor severity, gait smoothness, and cognitive performance. Using a compact motor-based feature set, logistic regression achieved a mean accuracy of 65.8% and an AUC of 0.737 in classifying low-MoCA status under cross-validation. These findings demonstrate that motor-derived digital biomarkers capture clinically meaningful information about cognitive status in PD and may serve as adjunctive tools for identifying cognitive vulnerability in clinical settings.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.