SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A De Novo <i>USP24</i> Variant as a Candidate Driver in a Neurodevelopmental Disorder: Insights from Trio-Based Whole-Exome Sequencing.

Int J Mol Sci · 2026-05-02

DOI: 10.3390/ijms27094086PMID: 42123666

Open accessresearch-article; Journal Article; Case ReportsOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), are increasingly recognized as conditions with a complex, multisystemic origin. ASD frequently co-occurs with other neurological conditions, such as epilepsy. We report a female patient, born to unrelated healthy parents, presenting with a complex clinical phenotype characterized by ASD level 1 with fluent speech, borderline intellectual functioning (BIF), coordination disorder, and epilepsy. Trio-based whole-exome sequencing (WES) revealed a de novo variant in the USP24 gene (c.3155G>T; p.Ser1052Ile), classified as likely pathogenic according to ACMG criteria (PS2, PM2, PP2, BP4). USP24 has previously been associated with Parkinson's disease and has recently emerged as a candidate risk gene for ASD. In addition, WES detected two variants of uncertain significance (VUS), both inherited from the clinically unaffected father: c.388G>C (p.Gly130Arg) in NRXN2 and c.6395C>A (p.Ser2132Tyr) in LRP2. Although neither gene shows a fully penetrant causal relationship with the observed phenotype, both have been implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders. Array-CGH analysis did not reveal pathogenic copy number variants; however, the presence of additional genetic contributors not detectable by WES cannot be excluded. Overall, the de novo USP24 variant likely represents the primary genetic driver of the phenotype, while the potential contribution of the inherited NRXN2 and LRP2 variants remains plausible. This case underscores the complexity of the genetic architecture underlying NDDs and supports a model involving cumulative effects of multiple variants rather than a strictly multigenic interaction.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.