SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Transmembrane domain switching controls PINK1 import and fate in mitochondria.

EMBO J · 2026-05-26

DOI: 10.1038/s44318-026-00789-xPMID: 42192124

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Mitochondrial targeting of the PINK1 kinase results, under normal conditions, in membrane-potential-driven inner membrane penetration and cleavage by the resident protease PARL before retro-translocation and proteasomal degradation. In compromised mitochondria, with reduced membrane potential, inner membrane incorporation is not achieved, which leads to surface activation of the full-length protein, Parkin recruitment and mitophagy. Here, we identify a third pathway in which PINK1 is imported into the mitochondrial matrix. Structural modelling predicts that PINK1's transmembrane domain (TMD) is conformationally plastic, forming either an α-helix or α/β-hybrid at the interface between Tim17 of the TIM23-complex for engagement of either ROMO1 or PARL. These mutually exclusive assemblies define distinct protein-import channels with differing biological roles. PINK1's α-helical TMD adopts a pose suggestive of translocation through the ROMO1/Tim17-channel, while the α/β-hybrid engages PARL and is cleaved. We propose that TMD structural plasticity determines whether PINK1 is imported into the matrix or cleaved and retro-translocated. The results expand the role of PINK1 beyond that of a damage sensor and imply a role in healthy mitochondrial function with potential relevance to Parkinson's disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.