SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Physiological classification of Parkinson's disease severity using multimodal speech biomarkers with a hybrid CNN-Mamba framework.

Front Physiol · 2026-05-18

DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2026.1806415PMID: 42232812

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionHypokinetic dysarthria in Parkinson's disease provides an accessible non-invasive biomarker, but multi-class severity grading remains difficult because of overlapping acoustic patterns and limited long-range temporal modeling in existing approaches.MethodsWe developed a hybrid CNN-Mamba framework using multimodal speech features transformed into 2D representations. The model was trained and validated on speaker-disjoint PC-GITA Spanish data and tested on an independent Mandarin clinical cohort, with additional external evaluation on a public Parkinsonian speech corpus. Speaker-level results were obtained by aggregating segment predictions within each subject.ResultsSegment-level accuracy reached 97.8% on PC-GITA and 95.4% on the Mandarin cohort. Speaker-level accuracy reached 94.0% and 91.2% using majority voting, improving to 94.8% and 91.9% with mean-probability aggregation. SHAP analysis supported physiological interpretability, and ablation studies showed advantages over CNN-BiLSTM, Transformer, and SVM baselines.DiscussionThe proposed CNN-Mamba framework provides an interpretable, computationally efficient, and non-invasive approach for Parkinson's disease severity assessment and remote monitoring, with promising cross-lingual transfer under structured clinical speech tasks.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.