SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Periodontal health in a longitudinal French cohort of people with Parkinson's disease.

Sci Rep · 2026-06-05

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-55641-3PMID: 42249009

Open accessresearch-article; Journal Article; Observational StudyOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Motor impairment associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) can hinder daily oral hygiene. This study aimed to assess the microbiological and clinical evolution of periodontal health in people with PD. This prospective cohort study included participants with PD. Clinical oral health data and microbiological samples were collected at baseline and after a follow-up period (median 7 months [range: 3-21]). Forty people with PD were recruited (35% female; median [Q1-Q3] age: 65.3 [57.9-72.8] years). The participants had good hygiene habits; however, no significant changes were observed in clinical parameters, including an increase in the proportion with a 'good' plaque index (+ 21 points, p = 0.239) and the reduction in the frequency of periodontal pockets > 6 mm (from 20% to 3%, p = 0.131). In contrast, using mixed-effects models accounting for follow-up time and intra-individual variability, a significant reduction in Treponema denticola bacterial load was observed (93% reduction in CFU/mL; 95% CI: 69%-98%; adjusted p = 0.012). Clinical oral hygiene parameters remained stable, while a significant change was observed in one microbiological parameter. These findings require confirmation in larger studies to better define oral care support for PD patients.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03827551, registered on January 31, 2019, (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03827551).

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.