SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Structure-Based Identification of Allosteric Glucocerebrosidase Stabilizers from <i>Xylia xylocarpa</i> (Roxb.) Taub. for Parkinson's Disease Using LC-MS Profiling and Computational Analysis.

Plants (Basel) · 2026-06-03

DOI: 10.3390/plants15111731PMID: 42280768

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease is strongly linked to lysosomal dysfunction, particularly reduced activity of glucocerebrosidase (GCase) encoded by the GBA1 gene. Stabilizing GCase using small-molecule modulators represents a promising therapeutic strategy. In this study, phytochemicals from Xylia xylocarpa (Roxb.) Taub., a medicinal plant with reported neuroprotective potential, were profiled using LC-QTOF-MS and evaluated as GCase stabilizers through an integrated computational approach. LC-MS analysis in positive and negative modes tentatively identified 19 metabolites, of which 13 low-molecular-weight compounds (<500 Da) were selected for molecular docking against human GCase. Docking revealed six compounds with higher predicted binding affinity than the reference activator Pyrrolopyrazine. Pharmacokinetic screening based on Lipinski's rule of five and ADMET predictions identified Senbusine A as a viable lead candidate. It exhibited favorable binding interactions, forming stabilizing contacts within a non-catalytic inter-monomer interface associated with structural modulation of GCase. PASS analysis suggested a high probability of neuroactive properties. Molecular dynamics simulations (200 ns) confirmed stable binding and reduced conformational fluctuations compared to apo and control systems. Overall, computational predictions identify Senbusine A as a potential pharmacological chaperone-like stabilizer of GCase, exhibiting a favorable pharmacological profile and warranting further experimental validation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.