SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

ActiTect: a generalizable machine learning pipeline for REM sleep behavior disorder screening through standardized actigraphy.

NPJ Digit Med · 2026-06-13

DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02738-8PMID: 42286243

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Isolated rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is a major prodromal marker of α-synucleinopathies, often preceding the clinical onset of Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, or multiple system atrophy. While wrist-worn actimeters hold significant potential for detecting RBD in large-scale screening efforts by capturing abnormal nocturnal movements, they require a reliable and efficient analysis pipeline. This study presents ActiTect, a fully automated, open-source machine learning tool to identify RBD from actigraphy recordings. To ensure generalizability across heterogeneous acquisition settings, our pipeline includes robust preprocessing and automated sleep-wake detection to harmonize multi-device data and extract physiologically interpretable motion features. Model development was conducted on a cohort of 78 individuals, yielding strong discrimination under nested cross-validation (AUROC = 0.95). Generalization was confirmed on a blinded local test set (n = 31, AUROC = 0.86) and two independent external cohorts (n = 113, AUROC = 0.84; n = 57, AUROC = 0.94). To assess robustness, leave-one-dataset-out cross-validation across cohorts demonstrated consistent performance (AUROC range = 0.84-0.89). Complementary stability analysis showed that predictive features remained reproducible across datasets, supporting the pooled multi-center pre-trained model for broader deployment. As an open-source, easy-to-use tool, ActiTect promotes adoption, independent validation, and collaborative improvements, thereby advancing generalizable wearable-based RBD detection.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.